Friday, July 22, 2005

In Memoriam Jerry Goldsmith

I can't believe I missed it. Jerry Goldsmith died a year ago yesterday. He was one of the greatest and most diverse composers to ever write for the silver screen with a particular knack for little character films and science fiction (although I wouldn't slight most of his vast action output, either). He was nominated for the highest achievement one can receive in film 17 times and won once for 1976's The Omen. He enjoyed long collaborations with the likes of Paul Verhoeven (Total Recall, Basic Instinct, Hollow Man), Franklin J. Schaffner (Planet of the Apes, Patton, The Boys From Brazil), Joe Dante (Gremlins, Innerspace, Small Soldiers) and Michael Crichton (Coma, The Great Train Robbery, The Thirteenth Warrior).

He began his career not as a composer but as a clerk/typist at CBS in the 1950s after taking classes in film scoring as USC with Miklos Rozsa. Soon he was scoring live radio programs and episodic television. He soon worked his way into regular episodic television scoring lots of now-forgotten CBS shows and several episodes of The Twilight Zone (the original is still the best). By the early '60s he was scoring between 4 and 9 (!) films a year creating works for such critical fare as A Patch of Blue, Planet of the Apes, and The Sand Pebbles. The '70s brought such films as Chinatown, Logan's Run, and the Oscar winning score for The Omen. The '80s brought more work and, in a post-Star Wars Hollywood, a huge sylistic shift that brought with it films like Ridley Scott's Legend (well, the European print of the film has Jerry's score. It was dumped once the film came stateside 2 years after is was made and replaced with a - gulp! - Tangerine Dream score. Ugh. Thank you, Sid Sheinberg) Poltergeist and Total Recall (yes, it was released in 1990, but it was made the year before! Incidentally one of Goldsmiths' personal favorite scores). The '90s brought such fare as Basic Instinct, Rudy, L.A. Confidential, The Edge, Air Force One, Mulan, The Mummy (which Goldsmith hated), and The Thirteenth Warrior. The twilight of his career brought scoring assignments that seemed more like favors for friends than anything. Hollow Man, Looney Tunes: Back In Action, The Sum of All Fears, Timeline (which was withdrawn because the film was a mess and heavily reedited. By this point Jerry was battling cancer and Brian Tyler stepped in to write a serviceable, though ultimately forgettable, score) and the underrated Star Trek: Nemesis. I would also be remiss not to mention that his theme for Star Trek: The Motion Picture graced the beginning of every episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation winning an Emmy for best theme and would go on to write the noble theme (and win another Emmy) for Star Trek: Voyager.

A friend of mine who played for Goldsmith a couple times once told me that Jerry had figured that he had written so much music for television and film that every minute of every day, somewhere in the world something with his music attached was being shown. That's impressive.

Despite his vast film and television output, he wrote only a handful of concert works. His "classical" works include the cantata Christus Apollo for orchestra, chorus and mezzo-soprano soloist based on a text by Ray Bradbury (with whom Goldsmith had been friends since his days at CBS), Music for Orchestra, commissioned by Leonard Slatkin and the Saint Louis Symphony in the early 1970s, and Fireworks, an abashedly neo-romantic work which Goldsmith wrote as a celebration of his hometown for his first concert series with the Los Angeles Philharmonic in 1999.

I still remember when my friend Mike called me to tell me that he had read that Jerry had died. It was like a very close friend had died. I was in a funk for a little while and knowing that I would never hear a new Jerry Goldsmith score again was a difficult pill to swallow. Even though I never met the man (regrettably) I always felt like I had known him a little bit through his music. One of those few composers in Hollywood that had his own sound (there are now even fewer) and, if you listened closely enough, you could in many cases hear his personality come through his music. You could always tell when he loved his subject and you could always tell when he was kind of poking fun at it (a la The Mummy).

For all those that derided film music as nothing more than a red-headed stepchild to "classical" music he said, "If our music survives, which I have no doubt it will, then it will be because it is good." I think this goes for any kind of music.

Jerry, for those of us that never met you but grew up on, learned from and knew you through your music, we still miss you.

5 comments:

Reed said...

why won't academic types lighten up on atonal? what am i missing about it that makes me NOT appreciate it? to me its more mathematics than music. also, i know i have a LOT to learn (including Schoenberg)...but help me connect the dots.

i thought of this question when you wrote Goldsmith's quote, "if the music survives, it is because it is good."

Herr Vogler said...

To me the biggest problem is that too many people emphasize the compositional means rather than the end. in the end the music is the only thing that matters. I very much consider myself an academic and there is much to be learned from the music of Schoenberg, Berg and Webern. But it has to appreciated first or else you'll never be able to learn from it. Also, as a composer, it's something that you absolutely should learn how to do regardless of whether you ever use it. To this end the greatest asset of any film composer is their ability to be flexible and speak as many musical languages as possible.

Atonal music isn't about mathematics. Or at least it shouldn't be. My master's thesis composition was a freely atonal piece developed entirely from a single 7-note set. The piece sounds VERY tonal, though, because of the way I used my material (There's a ton of triads. Just ask Mikey, He's heard it. I think he even liked it). Even the pieces to which I have applied serial principles have all been done in such a way so as to obscure the fact that it's a "serial" composition. In the end the music is the only thing that matters.

Might I suggest starting with Schoenberg's "Verklaerte Nacht", "Pelleas und Melisande", the String Quartets, Chamber Symphony, the "Gurre-lieder" and Berg's Violin Concerto, which is one of the most heartbreakingly gorgeous pieces I've ever heard, (all of which can be purchased inexpensively and in good performances on the Naxos label). These are all pieces written before Schoenberg fully developed his "system of compositions with twelve tones related only to each other". Listen to them all with a score in front of you. For me, it doesn't do any good to just listen without having the visual representation of the music in front of me to more deeply understand how a piece is put together.

Another thing I would suggest doing (as a future film composer) is attending one of Steven Scott Smalley's orchestration seminars in LA the next time it's available. The nearly 400 pages of scores and sketches is more than worth the price of admission and the expense of getting their if you're serious about wanting to learn how to be a better film composer.

Reed said...

it helps to read what you wrote. i know i lumped everything together in the word "atonal"...its only because i had a horrible experience with it. i posted on your response. thanks...

Herr Vogler said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Herr Vogler said...

I was also glad when the programmers at the AMPAS decided to use a lot of Jerry's music during the big show. It was, I thought, a fitting tribute to a truly great composer. Though for the life of me - and I'm sure this info is available - I can't remember all that they used.

My graduate composition teacher was all about how "atonal" music is presented. A bad experience (i.e.: my own undergraduate experience. Note to self: NEVER play Webern's Symphony, Op. 21 at 9:00 in the a.m. to a group of people who are largely still hungover) has the power to completely shut down any possible interest in the subject (which includes a lot of good music but also a lot of bad). Conversely, my graduate composition teacher was head of theory dept as well (small school) and gradually led the undergraduates to atonal music through baby steps and a lot of hand-holding. He never talked down to them, though, and he never said "this is the way!!!". As a composition teacher he never tried to force his style of composition on any one of his students. As a matter of fact, I dare say he probably had one of the more stylistically diverse studios in the state. And his willingness to NOT force any particular style on me actually made me MORE curious about different compositional techniques. He's still one of the most influential teachers I ever had.

Coming soon: a posting on great modern works that have both sound compositional technique and a lot of heart.